Using wireless networks for accessing the Internet has become increasingly popular. These days you can access the Internet from virtually anywhere by connecting to a wireless network.
In our security article - Punti pubblici di accesso wireless: il mondo a portata di mano oppure luoghi a rischio? - we showed how a person could set up a wireless access point to harvest information from unsuspecting users.
This month an incident of large-scale data harvesting has been revealed.
The story goes like this:
"(...) We collect the following information--photos, local WiFi network data and 3-D building imagery. (...) Google does not collect or store payload data."
There has been substantial speculation in the media regarding how long this data collection had been going on, and how much data that was collected.
We shall however leave this particular incident for the rest of this article, and rather focus on the general lesson to be learned from this.
The information that was transmitted over the Internet and intercepted went through non-secured access points.
The most important lesson to learn from this is that you should never transmit any kind of confidential information when accessing the Internet through an open wireless network. You never know who may monitor the information, either directly as we discussed in our article referred to above, or by collecting the information flow as Google (mistakenly) did with its Street Cars.

The minor inconvenience involved in ensuring that you connect to the Internet through a secure wireless connection, is neglectable compared to the risk of divulging your own or your organization's secrets to the wrong recipients.
Home users as well as organizations connect to the Internet through their own wireless access point.
It may be tempting to set this up as an open access point as this may be perceived as more convenient, and even as a favor to friends and neighbors. However, the risk for information leakage does far exceed any inconveniences that the users and access point responsible may feel. Any ordinary person does not have to think hard before coming up with examples of transmitted information that is not meant for indiscriminate public knowledge.
One of the more interesting aspects is the media attention that this case has received. This proves that privacy issues are getting increasingly focused, both by national agencies as well as the general public.
As they should!